Quoted By:
This situation is beyond frustrating and reeks of hypocrisy. Stronny has once again imposed her will on the girls by limiting their Fansly streams to just one per month. Meanwhile, she hasn't even bothered to do any herself. It's clear what's really going on here—Stronny is trying to funnel the audience into her preferred revenue streams: Patreon and Superchats. Why? Because she gets a cut, a fat 20% of everything, while the girls do all the work.
This isn't just about content control; it's about greed. Stronny knows that Fansly streams offer the girls a direct way to connect with their audience and earn a decent income. But since Fansly doesn't pad her pockets like Patreon and Superchats do, she's putting the squeeze on. It's a blatant conflict of interest, one that stinks of desperation.
Let's not kid ourselves—Stronny's obsession with pushing Patreon isn't just about 'supporting the talent.' It's a transparent attempt to cover her own financial blunders. Remember the script manager she hired? The one who’s probably costing her more than she ever budgeted for? It’s classic sunk cost fallacy in action. She’s poured so much into this decision that she’s doubling down, squeezing every penny out of the girls to make up for her bad judgment. And who pays the price? The talent and their fans.
This whole situation is dripping with cognitive biases. Stronny’s anchoring on Patreon and Superchats, trying to force the girls to follow her lead because she can't bear to admit she made a mistake. She’s exploiting the authority bias, banking on the idea that because she’s in charge, her decisions are automatically correct, when in reality, they’re self-serving and detrimental to everyone else.
Then there’s the scarcity tactic she's employing with these Fansly streams. By limiting them, she’s creating an artificial demand, hoping that fans will flock to Patreon instead. It’s a manipulative, calculated move to maximize her cut, not to support the girls or their content.
Stronny’s whole approach is a textbook example of the self-serving bias. She frames her decisions as being in the best interest of the company, when really, they’re all about protecting her own financial interests. The irony is palpable—she’s quick to limit others while doing nothing herself. It’s hypocritical, exploitative, and frankly, insulting to both the talent and their fans.
If Stronny really cared about the girls’ success, she’d let them explore all revenue streams freely, not just the ones that line her pockets. This arbitrary limit on Fansly streams is nothing but a thinly veiled attempt to control and profit off the hard work of others. The fans and the talent deserve better than to be pawns in Stronny’s game of financial catch-up.
It’s time to call out this manipulation for what it is. Stronny's decision-making is not about the long-term health of VAllure; it’s about covering her own mistakes and greed. She’s leveraging every cognitive bias in the book to justify her actions, but the truth is clear—this is exploitation, plain and simple. The community deserves transparency and fairness, not this thinly disguised money grab.
