>>15055066Eh, chartanons are the only good posters in those threads, I rather doubt the shitposters starting new threads are the same anons who make the charts. Without them it's impossible to satisfy my curiosity or see trends which ought to be the reason those threads exist, but 4chan is 4chan. Besides, arguing about concrete numbers features a chance — however minimal — of providing some kind of worthwhile conclusion which an argument about headcanon numbers really doesn't.
