>>915725Thanks, anon. I appreciate that, I really do.
>>915959I might have a small learning curve to figure out how to do it, but I'm super interested in that. If I'm understanding correctly you essentially just need a really high resolution picture of a flat piece of fabric? I have solid lighting and a decent phone so I can generate that pretty readily, and if there's anything that has to be done digitally by me before sending it along to the artist/modelers I'm decently handy in photoshop and illustrator (open source equivalents but you know what I mean) and can learn any other programs very quickly so it shouldn't be a problem.
Figuring I would do the dye on some really high threadcount plain fabric and it should look almost digital when it's done. 