>>62644700>I still remember when retards here actually believed that Kobo's numbers have fallen below kaelaThey actually did. For a single day
>July 22 this yearKaela's 30 days average was ahead of Kobo's. That, of course, is not a trend (Kobo clearly is ahead of Kaela) but it was very remarkable to see how high Kaela had risen and how low Kobo had fallen
