>>27206478That's one of the most retarded things I've heard in this thread, and there is some gay anon that ragged on tomboys.
You are essentially saying if they sing like an idol group, dance like an idol group, interact with the audience like an idol group and dresses like an idol group but says
>no homoor
>we're not idolsthat means they're not idols or, at least, emulating idol groups?
That makes me think what's so bad about being "idols" if it is just a word that one can say or deny with no other distinction but the "brand"
