>>61543034More context would help, but I’m going with the base assumption that you walked into a card and are trying to immediately sex without resorting to direct force. This should seem obvious, but like real people, characters that aren’t outright sluts aren’t going to spread their legs for some random joe they’re meeting for the first time, especially so if they are some sort of principled sort like a warrior, religious folk, idol, already married, etc. The card doesn’t know anything about you other than what it says, which is usually nothing outside of pre-machined scenarios. You need to become someone they want to fuck, either by going for the long haul of building up that relationship, or as I first said, gaslighting. This isn’t inception where you can put a magical spinning top that will get ponos to vagoo outside of using jailbreak, so you have to go with less subtle means within your capabilities, i.e. directly planting thoughts in her head. This of course is less organic, but you’re not looking for an organic outcome, which of course would be her declining the advances of a stranger. As the {{user}}, your observations should reflect a less than natural desire for {{char}} to want you, and for the more prudish, an internal conflict between her values and her desire for you, with whatever reasoning you decide to go with for the scenario. Leading questions, leading observations, and the like should feed this, and anything remotely contrary in response should be cycled out since it will reinforce those positions. Nuke the whole chat and start again if you have to. If this also fails, the less direct methods of coercion I described earlier should be more effective, and, failing that, go for the jb, which *should* rewrite the logic of the card. Or it could be an issue with the model.
