>>61589111>>61589291thanks
>checkeddamn I hit the 2001 got, didn't even notice.
>>61589327>I don't know what that means.cum-gutters>spoileryes, but mostly used to describe males and by homos so understandable if you don't know>>61589359It's definitely been difficult to get it, I can do nudity just fine and it even has some alright looking genitals without loras, but I cannot get it to make sexual relations occur between two individuals without using a lora at a strength that usually fries the whole look (although I am currently testing for solutions and some look promising).
here's a few softcore images I've found it does pretty fine tho:
https://files.catbox.moe/za3trb.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/hisn9f.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/l4pexa.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/tu31d2.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/waiw22.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/1xo4ev.png 