>>71855383It doesn't really matter if it's good or bad, she just has to be able to acknowledge it to be comparable to something, Neuro isn't exactly known for being "good" at things
Let's say she draws a crude circle, she can then look through her vision database to conclude that the circle is an apple, and from that point on she can always correlate that specific circle to being an apple
She could then collect and store these creations and categorize them, potentially allowing her to create specific scenes with objects that she has created beforehand which share commonality
Having an image be referenced after her drawing something makes her drawing her own, compared to using reference images to draw something specific
Just spit-balling, don't know whether or not any of this is possible, let alone Vedal still wanting to do this
or even having the motivation to do it in the first place 