>>80388344oh, you thought you had managed to run away from me did you tsundere little sap? Not so
>the conversation is specific to sexual preference, that can't be applied to just anythingand? how does simply pointing out that 'a lot of people have a special attachment (fetish) for X sexual thing' prove that it's abnormal/uncommon? It doesn't
there's no contradiction between something being a special sexual interest and it being a common one
>like stated before anyone can make the observations Freud did, making all of them about sex is another thingyou're just assuming that them making them all about sex is self-evidently crazy by default and that this is somehow a counterargument
it's circular logic, arguing for the ridiculousness of the theory based on your own presupposed feeling that it is ridiculous
>maybe Freud should have taught chimps instead if he wanted his teachings to be completely accuratea pithy one-liner but it proves naught
>not dying before 30 probably changes how people think nowwhy/how would this change the inherent genetic and neurological hardwiring of a species in a timespan as miniscule as just a few thousand or even hundred years? This doesn't make any sense and has no basis
also, once again, some kinds of incest are still common today and incest fetishes are common and prevalent everywhere
>most of history is about the past too doesn't mean it still appliesit does still apply; something being history doesn't magically mean it's completely alien and detached from our present time today and has no connection to it; this is, once again, like a liberal 'end of history' type of belief that is ahistorical and has no evidence for it
>explain it thenmy point in saying this was naive is that there are obviously people with siblings who are still into incest porn, obviously everybody has parents and yet many, many people are into parent-related incest porn or adjacent fetishistic feelings - to the point that the idea of daughters being into their dads is a totally normal and commonplace thing in society
e.g.
the term 'daddy's girl' 'daddy issues' any kind of female sexual thing involving calling their male partner 'daddy' (which seems to be exceedingly common)
another example of this on the mother side:
how do 'your mom' jokes even make sense or work as an insult? why would you be upset about someone else fucking your mom? Explain that
>subjectiveno
>can't really accept it if it's not a dilemma in my headit's not consciously a dilemna in your head, which is the point
the difference between me and you (and most people) is that you are too pussified to stare the blackness of the human heart in its face whereas I am not; you dismiss these ideas merely because they are frightening and unsettling to you and make you think you'd be a bad person if you even entertained them for a moment
stop being tsundere and just accept that you are a brutish chimp with barely suppressed urges that wants to ravage your mommy already, it's not hard
this is till on-topic btw because it's about explaining what the archetypal appeal of Fauna is to saplings and proving she is still a mommy archetype, which is what the original point was
