>>36716647Huh wow that's really interesting, linguistics tidbits are always interesting to learn. But this isn't the first time Bae's made the mistake so I'm still pretty sure she just simply misspelt it as usual
Besides, the omitted pronoun occurred mid-sentence, which isn't "exposed" so to speak...
>"Whatever is exposed (in sentence initial position) can be swept away. [...]"...and it feels weird to not use a third-person pronoun in this context, in which case it wouldn't apply as it doesn't appear anywhere else.
>In general, exposed first-person subjects are vulnerable in statements, and second-person in questions; and any exposed pronoun is vulnerable if it is recoverable from later in the sentence. 