>>86362540So either way, regardless of whether you thought it was 3 (like it should've been) or the actual 2 links in turned out to be your argument is completely wrong. It doesn't even matter if you thought I was lying then or making something up right now, either way
Especially since it also has a stage and the stripper that I would've wanted kept in the first part, which you would know, or at least could have put together if you read the damn thing. But you didn't even actually read the catbox link much less click on it you fraud, because all 3 (but technically 2) of them were different enough
And to think I haven't actually felt "Hey, everyone point and laugh at this loser" in a while but here I am
Not to mention it was also like a part 2/bonus requests as well if the person felt like taking it up or by some chance one person wanted to only do want part. The request was highly "optional"
>In cases where there are too many references, they create a collage of those referencesThis just sounds like the most reasonable, basic thing to do in the scenario. Especially when it's not like there's a reference sheet and you want as many angles and variations that'd work for you as you could reasonable put
>In resume. You could simply make a reference that is your own instead of this >>86358601 (You) Frankenstein made using other posts.Dude I know you know the word "collage." Are you really so paranoid you have to liken the idea of "multiple pictures in one" as a "chimera" or "Frankenstein" (and yes I will "it's Frankenstein's monster" you because honestly at this point, fuck you)
>Hey why did you stole my reference for my request?>Why did you delete your post after apologizing to me?! What is going on with you.>You say sorry and then you do this again in the same thread? That's fucking weird manOoooh okay. Looks like some kind of projection-based paranoia I see
TL:DR (The thing you don't respond to if you're going to ignore the above in your response and act like it was never addressed)
Well as much as I'd love to see you wriggle your way out of the massive dumbass fuck up you just made, I'm not gonna respond to this anymore because there's clearly nothing to add
Your either a troll or you can't read, comprehend, click links, argue without being disingenuous, and can't understand context. Not everyone's a malicious. I'm not the Zen request guy who had a similar idea and deleted their post because you got all uppity. Deal with it
Even if I did hide behind "It's a coincidence" the nature of a coincidence is an unlikely event so I don't know what to tell you. I'm just gonna ignore this logic since if someone the same/a similar character, pose, act, context or reference then I guess it might as well be "stealing" a visual representation of an idea. All of which or amalgamations of other ideas
I just wanted to see the rock loli cop's ass in booty shorts and got this
But thanks actually letting me know to fix the last catbox of the request next thread
