>>11723799For the record, only one was verbal about the metacoin holding and it was someone who refuse to play the game.
I think limiting the trading to be player to player was the right idea but giving the coins a pool limit isn't exactly the right idea. If we limit the trades to players buying from a player selling or vice versa, we could at least force some people, not all because there would still be people holding, to sell or buy during adjustments.
There are already some players who go against the trend and we could take full advantage of oshicoiners that way. For the shitcoins refer to what
>>11713758 said.
>but if people aren't buying them now, I don't think people will in the futureI do see a problem with this though, that is if the shitcoins suddenly held a big event, where will people get coins if the holders refused to sell and where will the coin holders sell said shitcoins. Maybe that's a good idea to put in the pool. Maybe make the shitcoins have their own pool and limit the popular or coins that has huge volume to be player to player only.
Another thing about the current popular coin holding meta, there's nothing wrong with it. It's IMPOSSIBLE to not own any of said coins with our current market and excessive amount of reds UNLESS you really hate the idea of holding metacoins or hate the holo.
Or just hate the idea of playing the game. 