>>4413801This thread is full retarded.
In case people want the actual contention right now, instead of OP's cockfaggotry:
- T-chan says manager says dloow is not banned in chat.
- Chumbuds report they have not been able to mention dloow in chat or superchat for a long time.
So unless there is vast conspiracy, we have two conflicting claims. Money is currently on the manager being technical with the truth (i.e. dloow is not banned right now, but they said nothing about the past).
You wouldn't know about this from reading OP. Because he is too busy talking about "normalfag", "reddit", "Hololive moments".... or whatever to generate the maximum amount of rage, instead of telling the full story.
>is this the end for them?Ironically, sounds like you are the one who has the skill to write clickbait thumbnails.
