>>87896275Oh man, this feels like driving a new car. The way weights work is pretty different.
I'm copy-pasting prompts I liked on v01 with the same settings.
A lot of my results could be specific to my artist mix (using Illustrious tags) so keep that in mind. These results could largely come down to how this model uses my artist tags
First Impressions.
>The GoodBackground objects are way more detailed. HANDS seem more consistent? Seemingly better at sex scenes.
More detailed shading is bringing out smaller details, like the aforementioned hands, feet, joints, muscles, etc.
>GeneralEven though the cfg is the same (4) it seems to listen more to weights.
Less "AI bullshit" in the way backgrounds are pieced together.
>The BadColors are less saturated. Some lighting tags are nerfed heavily, which combines with the lower saturation for overall flatter images.
Less randomness in the composition is leading to some blander results.
>OverallSince it makes better objects and better sex scenes this is an improvement no matter if I wanna prompt sfw or nsfw.
I can get the images pretty colorful, but I do miss the previous saturation. The images now are slightly more muted.
It still makes my shit look 10x better than on Illustrious SmoothFT. Thank you for your work anon!
