>>7738971Hm. I'd need to go deep, deep into the archives to see if it was just posted as is, or as a snippet that they mentioned they liked or some such. But I thought the Sora post was older than that? There's no way it was just made in June.
>It was posted on June 16th and one of the replies to it is "I feel like I've seen this before on AO3"What the fuck. Alright, then. I'll hold the URLs elsewhere but in the mean time, barring the author speaking up, I'll take it off.
