>>52390954I see, so case by case basis, as expected. Good detail that they would cull herds if they presented potential thread to the ecosystem as a whole. Would that also apply if a certain population greatly grew and presented a possible threat to the balance in the forest?
>last thing on your mindTrue, I'd probably be more concerned with putting as many babies in your "mommy" than an apple. Though immortality to do just that doesn't sound so bad...
>>52391483Yea see here's the thing.
1: I'm lazy
2: I now have more than 1 oshi to watch streams of in my scarce spare time
3: I'll be busy with divegrass in the coming months
Add all of those together, and you get a definitive...maybe.