>>70533652>>70533652>Who'd they accuse? Tell me>i tell you a secret>you tell the world>you accuse me of saying it in public>you are a dumbass>LMAO. If you have to assume that the sentence " I will release a further statement in which I have evidence and receipts" means she WASN'T going to post the evidence, then I don't know what to tell youPlease don't misquote someone. People can actually look at the vod and see her exact words.
>I will be publishing a future statement, in the future, regarding it. Which, I have evidence and receipts, as well as backed up by my lawyer.Those are two separate statements.
>I'll tell you. She uses the word "story" and "statement" as if they're two different things that she'll show. The tweet is obviously the statement. The story is obviously what she wrote and showed to her lawyer.I'm still unsure of what you are asking. Timestamp for where she uses the two as if they are two different things please.
>No. I'm saying why would her and a lawyer prepare a fucking tweet in advance and why they would actually regard that as a "document".Because saying things in the heat of the moment is a great way to have what you are saying misconstrued. Because people misspeak. Just like the quote I properly gave her above. It's full of grammatical errors. Because she's not thinking rationally while she's having a fucking panic attack after witnessing her name be dragged live on stream. You always take the time and calm down before making a statement so that you can say what you actually mean, without ambiguity. The lawyer assists in that process. They clear up any "fuzzy" language that could be seen to have multiple possible meanings. Prevent confusion before it starts. You know, like the argument over whether she was going to post receipts.
>This is just blatantly wrong.Well I'm sorry but Oxford disagrees. Take it up with them.
>Prove a single instance in a court where someone sued their boss for speaking about why that person was rightfully fired.Ah see that's the kicker. The termination notice was not accurate. It contained falsehoods intended to slander her. Like blaming her for not paying artists. Please don't ask me to find a specific case where someone sued their boss because they slandered them in a termination notice. Defamation is defamation regardless of when and where it happens.
>Lol. Lmao even. PicrelPIPEDA is replaced by other laws only because those other laws are more stringent. That is to say, they are stronger and stricter with how they handle things. In other words, if PIPEDA doesn't apply, it's because something even worse for you does. Do you want me to look for the specific overriding laws in those jurisdictions? I can, but you really won't like the results. Not exactly a secret that there is only one PST timezoned region in CA.
>Winning the court of public opinion with lies is scummy.The public was given the right to an opinion when Anycolor decided it needed to become a public matter.
>If she actually faced injustice, why is she not trying to hold them legally responsible?I answered this already. With two different reasons.
>So?So what?
>"Single document" . Doki's tweets and Vox say there are more than one. Keep up.Feel free to quote where Doki says so. Actually tell me where Vox says so as well. And no, using the word documentS is not going to cut it. A single packet of documents is still a single packet. Your argument was that only some of it was agreed to be private, and you haven't proven that yet.
>Don't feel copy and pasting a rrat.>rratThose were timestamped links to youtube videos. A courtesy you have yet to extend to me.
>Pomu was planning on graduating 6 months in advance, she ended up actually graduating later than when she first spoke about it.I'm sure you have proof that she intentionally, of her own volition, stalled. If so I'll concede the point on Pomu.
>Mysta only talked about graduating with management months ago. He actually ended up deciding to later. >Graduation preparation like recording a final song, getting perms and planning the final graduation stream is what takes a long time.That's a really generous view of things anon. I mean sure, he talks about how it's a bunch of meetings and how everyone in EN knew he was graduating for a long while... but yeah those words could just mean anything. I mean, I'm sure they do actually help out with the graduation stream. Right? Sure they leave you on your own for debuts, but graduation? Nah surely they pitch in there.
>Confirmation bias is real.It certainly is.
>The flowchart argument. If she requested to graduate in January, why would her lawyer tell her they're not responding a week after she wanted to leave the company and not the day she wanted to graduate?>ask to leave in jan>ghosted a week>lawyer says send documents>sent documents>firedNot sure where the confusion is here. picrel
https://twitter.com/dokibird/status/1757763627413631383 