>>35029640Again, I agreed that some human factors are immutable and unchangeable. Chief amongst them, human perceptual biases. We have biases towards reality because of sense limitations. You can actually see tangible examples by asking how a blind man experiences reality and comparing it to the averages sighted person. These are not the type of biases I am discussing.
I am discussing thought biases only. These biases are malleable in humans, and even if they are not, we can recognize that they are not necessarily objectively true. We have free agency to understand, for example, that we experience time in a flawed manner. We cannot change how we perceive time in a flawed manner, but we can change our biases about what we believe about time.
The neural network currently lacks that capability. It hits a hard brick wall. Even if it can recognize the programmed biases as such, it can do nothing to even change their biases about them. This is different from being unable to change physiological flaws in perception, unless you want to argue that I myself am being unfairly biased toward human perceptions in this argument. You could, and I would agree, but this is my subjective experience and understanding of things; that results in my subjective definition of free agency in these examples.
