Quoted By:
People (even here) still didn’t fully realize what happened here.
When ironmouse clip channel got terminated for three copyright strikes a chain reaction started because THE PERSON BEHIND THE CHANNEL (ironmouse “person inside”) is the one getting banned, not the channel. That means
>every YouTube channel she ever registered gets terminated as well (and her main one just got got)
>every gmail mailbox she has under that account gets terminated as well
>any Google cloud account (and hosted websites, registered domains, databases and other cloud services) gets their service terminated and
>any app she published in the google play store gets removed
It’s a ban from every google property and if the same person either makes a new account or gets access to someone else’s account (like the company account) it risks getting terminated as well.
And all it takes is some copyright holder clicking “strike” three times on a couple of seventeen seconds clips posted without proper permission in your channel.
“What about fair use”, people might ask. That’s for the court of law but YouTube copyright strikes are EXTRAJUDICIAL measures, as they reserve the right to host or not host anything in their site. That was something they cooked with Viacom when they were losing that lawsuit in their early years, something terribly lopsided in favor of the rights holders.
Long story short: if YouTube wants you dead you’re a goner and it’s not just the YouTube channel