>>77076555>If the entirety of>A=B>A=C>A=D>Then>B=C>C=D>D=B>suggests this is false.No, it doesn't, because as I already explained, the expressions we're using in actual human language do not map to the statements in propositional logic you're using here - which makes the rules governing them and the relationships between them as true as they are irrelevant.
>The clover example is a composition fallacy which is an entirely different argument.It is neither a composition fallacy, nor is it a different argument.
No one is saying that that which is true for the part must universally be true for the whole - just that the part can accurately be said to *be* the whole. Which is true, as can be demonstrated by the fact that all of the statements I made regarding this hypothetical clover and its individual leaves are all plainly correct.