>>27796637Working on putting together a first draft for the final chuubanite doc atm. So was a conclusion actually reached about whether chuubanite should require both a glyph + activator or not? Majority opinion seemed to be against that change last night, but I think most of the thread was asleep by then. Also, paragraphsanon, that entire conversation was remarkably civil. I feel strangely proud of the progress you've made with your communication skills over the past few days.
