>>744121>you didn't have any other argumentsI easily corrected all the bullshit people were spouting. Everything from VODs being overhyped, to sub ratios to the timezone cope to the membership headcanon. All you said was tags is the ultimate metric, which you have yet to prove and is laughably retarded.
>repeating yourselfBecause they keep the repeating the same false narratives which I easily corrected.
>The VODs were the counterpoint to the dead subsAnd here, I have to repeat myself again because you yourself ironically is the broken record. This is the last time I'll repeat this, I'll simply ignore VODshit in this thread from now on.
1. Gura doesn't even get significantly higher VOD views than the other top Holos
>>7412472. Bringing up VODs only makes Gura looks bad, counterintuitive to your whiteknighting. We don't know how many of Gura's viewers have adblock so no way to calculate her VOD revenue, could be really high, could be really low. She has pretty much a 1-million sub advantage, yet she can only gets like 200k more VOD views when the difference should be higher, it's because of her dead subs not watching, aka her terrible sub-viewer ratio. Korone and Pekora also get those higher end 800k VOD views and 600k despite having significantly less subs than Gura's. Their viewer ratios shit on hers, imagine if they had 2 million subs with the same ratio they have now.
3. Gura speaks English so she has an inherent advantage over the Japanese Holos, she has a much wider audience. But she even fails to get as many live watchers because her subs aren't watching, where did the 2 million people go? Right, dead subs.
4. Gura already tried streaming at an earlier timezone and got 17,000 live watchers, even worse than her usual. So the timezone cope doesn't work. Gura's last LM stream only had 13,000 people watching for the majority of it, so yeah her 2 million sub count is nothing but a facade. Her actual number of live subs are mostly likely less than the other top Holos'.
Mentioning 'muh VODs' again will only get you linked to this post.
>Gura's populariry creates a following They all have their following. Gura's isn't that special, except maybe in the number of dead subs/fags that don't donate to her.
>no actual hard evidenceI'm the only one throughout this entire thread actually presenting facts with actual sources, you're obsessing over a metric that hasn't given Gura any actual success. Why can't 'muh tags' get her a proper viewer to sub ratio? Why can't it let her have higher net worths than people with MILLIONS less subscribers than her? Why can't it have her get as many live watchers (therefore more fan interaction) and sc revenue as Holos with millions less subscribers? Literally every new post you make is only proving me right and making Gura look even worse.
