>>102902660It's because they are literal NPCs who are fed opinions by what is popular on Twitter, and what's popular on Twitter gets decided by government-funded thinktanks pushing psyops. Look at their defence of their stance, it's always, "AI is stealing real artists' jobs!" meanwhile all the artists who had jobs still have them and the only difference now is what tools the sweatshop Koreans and Indians are using to mass produce. Meanwhile if governments can maintain an anti-AI sentiment then it makes it easier for them to control what is publicly available and do things like forcing OpenAI to lobotomise GPT so it's unable to elaborate on crime statistics. I bet if you tried to tell such people that the British government is currently actively censoring protests against them they would say there's no way such a thing could happen and call you a schizo because they read a BBC article calling that misinformation.
