>>54459611Pic Rel: Is rolfgroomer defending pedo sadists now?
>>54459646Even if we assume that were part of it, why is it unreasonable to expect that people can let loli slide but are going to get sick of seeing people posting on the regular that they want to brutalize a fascimile of a child? Then get blocked by the same types from sending a tile with an uplifting message about cleansing themselves of their past to that person? Of course, pedos and groomers always frame fair reactions to their behavior in terms of the person that they have hurt or antagonized in terms of the other party being the one who is at fault.
