>>77253100That could be true. Like I've said, I won't claim to have any knowledge of what happens behind the scenes. Its just that shit like that can potentially lead to really murky scenarios when an issue springs up. If you check Offkai's site, there are dozens of rules that attendees and vendors must abide by, if one of these rules are violated, there has to be some contractual agreement that allows Offkai administration to remove the violator from the premises without facing counter repercussion due to the person paying for attendance.
>>77253495I am going on an autistic tirade because the shit you're implying is wrong. It's not even a fucking implication. You're saying now that theres implicit contracts in place, but in the original post you said
>Offkai is not a professional organization that you can "sue" for damages, there's no contract, lolYou quite literally said "There's no contract". Don't try to gaslight when I can scroll up and see what you typed earlier, unless you're a different anon and things are getting confused.
