>>52378314Finally done with mixing stuff, time to be more active.
>>52507281I like how 5C looks in those, so decided to give it a try, though I ran into something very interesting. On model 1, it seemed to have no effect compared to 5B, but on model 2.. very very interesting outcomes. (Tests are S2, 5B, 5C. if you were curious on why there's 3 models)
Model 1:
https://files.catbox.moe/cr68h6.png Test 1
https://files.catbox.moe/929sin.png Test 2
Model 2:
https://files.catbox.moe/2m6l9j.png Test 1 (weird fluke difference)
https://files.catbox.moe/ymt121.png Test 2
>>52512304>52509196I think you accidentally replied to the wrong anon haha.
>>52514928Really cute fauna, anon!
>>52510592Good morning Lot anon!
