>>72487425So it's not really definitive proof. That image could have been edited by anyone, but it's in character for her and it fits the timeframe for when she was stressed? Am I understanding that right?
I'm all for
>DOKI, I KNOW YOU'RE HERE>Is this, "Doki," in the room with us?>She could be you! She could be me!posts, though. In fact, how do I know that
>>72485774 isn't Doki getting tired of us not noticing her posting?
