>>17887966The point is being able to bet at everything gives you a guarantee of winning and being able to refund the money you spent, which a one time gambling shouldn't give you.
My main point about this is it's gambling, you should just be able to win all or lose all, not some kind of coward or amateur that will bet all the same amount at the spinning roulette hoping and praying that it nets you more than what you already had. In our betting, it's a lot easier to rig it just by simply looking at the pot and how few have bet on the opposite side on a 1-1 or 2 options. I don't need to do or to look at the math to prove how broken or how useless betting is, if what I'm here is for the essence of gambling.
I don't even know mahjong, but even the mahjong matches people play here have a better and working proper gambling. I know it's because they probably play several matches, hoping they could do a comeback but that also means one can lose more and that's all great, but betting shouldn't give you the ability to make a comeback or a safety backup to gain some of the money you bet on the losing side, more so since it's a rarely occurrence.