>>72350924>>72351441There's one shit general on /fa/ and thats pretty much it for watch discuss them. I'll take the chance to talk to some chumbuddies about them instead.
>>72351094I looked for a total of maybe 5-10 minutes. That's all you're worth. The Japanese price is definitely more fine, but we aren't getting the Japanese price, we are paying close to $100 more. I still don't understand why the year of a watch have any relevance. If its a model thats been made for a while youre still getting a newly produced product. Theyve just been making it the same for a while. With something like a watch if it ain't broke don't fix it. Tried and true reliability is usually better than new (and again the movement here isn't new, it's from 2016).
