>>34718109was i2i after a touch up
tEXtDescription {{{uruha rushia}}}, 1girl, bangs, sunset, small breasts, backlit, beach, looking back, facing viewer, double bun, {sundress}, green hair, looking at viewer, {smile}, see-through silhouette, see-through, grin, virtual youtuber, red eyes, {ass}, thigh gap, bare ass, no panties, butt crack
"steps": 50, "sampler": "k_euler_ancestral", "seed": 1807704564, "strength": 0.35, "noise": 0.2, "scale": 21.0, "uc": "nsfw, lowres, bad anatomy, bad hands, text, error, missing fingers, extra digit, fewer digits, cropped, worst quality, low quality, normal quality, jpeg artifacts, signature, watermark, username, blurry
>>34718198idk I haven't really had to emphasize it beyond a specific pose or clothing items that would necessitate a full body shot. if you're only asking for e.g. facial expressions I imagine it will give you a close up. you could also try excluding "close up".
>ask for choco>get marine 