>>46640426>>46640857I did think that was the case, but then
I didn't understand what you were talking about so I thought maybe it was because you were talking to someone else kek.
Reading it back, I see that it's a reading issue on my end and I now completely understand what you were talking about.
Sorry, it's late and I'm not very sharp right now, didn't mean to come off sounding dismissive or accusatory.
>>46640489Glad you enjoyed!