>>12676478>>12677574I will watch a stream I wouldn't otherwise watch if (You) guys are fangirling about it in the thread.
Ayamyposter has gotten me to watch more than one of her streams. Otherwise? Nah, am busy. I kept a few memberships for the chubas whose content I either enjoyed a lot or still enjoy, if anything, to get the next badge...
>>12673489Thank you, 50 seems reasonable indeed.
>>12674839Volatility seems like it hasn't scaled "properly" with coin volume, but without seeing the numbers behind it, I'm just blowing smoke out of my tuchus. Some kind of "volume/time" based scale on volatility would be bretty good. If everyone starts a run on a coin, it should tank harder. If, relatively speaking, "nobody" is buying a dip, it should move more slowly. For it to not be "broken" it would have to both track current volume of that particular coin vs. current total market volume
i.e. the current transactions on that coin represent a disproportionate amount of total transactions AND somehow scale with some arbitrarily defined "historical" volume/time measure for that particular coin. It's making MY head spin, but I imagine the Dev that handles those equations will pop a chub thinking about it.
