>>82612042Close enough! Thank you.
>>82616715>Grab any of the gens from the link I posted above and try to replicate it. Forgot to mention that all the metadata is obviously scrubbed. They take their """""UNIQUE AND EXCLUSIVE STYLE NOBODY ELSE HAS OR USES""""" very seriously, you know? It's unfortunate but it is what it is.
But if you somehow manage to find a gen where that's not the case, you just hit jackpot.
>>82571785>Cladenstine seems to be okay with artists, see picrelNot really. Not from my testing at least as I posted my result here
>>82588961 And that's with sole focus on one artist tag. Sure I can amplify it to 2.0 or some crazy number but I bet it will fuck up the image even more. Then again why would I do that when I can prompt a single artist tag with Leek or 4th tail and get an amazing result with it instead? Picrel is leek.
Of course, if you mean "change the default look of the model" type of "okay" then yes, in that sense it's "okay". But it doesn't even come close to other models if you want an actual look of the artist.
>I think quality tags in the prompt is what is forcing the models standard styleYou think? That would be pretty funny if that's the case. I haven't tested that.
>>82615640>Cladenstine defenitely has a bias when it comes to males kekYeah, tell me about it. The amount of cuckshit it was trained on compared to normal skin color is like 9 to 1 ratio. Hence this is the result.
