>>100790894>>100790941>they fell for my clever jestyou see, I intentionally responded to that post correcting someone with the wrong implication myself for a light bit of quirky humor. My post is still technically correct but the image I posted makes you think I was implicating Nina Saotome as the culprit. It's an intentional continued chain of misdirection from the original misleading post which is still not providing the correct answer!
Quite clever if I do say so myself.
