>>62944358Morning /vtai/
>>62948936Great gen, love the smug even when she's stuck.
>>62954550God I wish that were me.
>>62965775Full exposure: I've used NAI since it's inception as a smut generator, long before imagegen. So I am somewhat biased. Hopefully this doesn't come across as too shilly.
I really like NAI3, like a hell of a lot. The ability to just get things on-model amazes me.
Simply look at this Fubuki, and see how many of the details it gets right, (1st catbox imagegen, 2nd details sheet)
https://files.catbox.moe/lezb3l.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/55o17d.jpgWhat amazes me most is it's versatility. Just compare these, all done on the base model.
https://files.catbox.moe/w6bq7g.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/hxaf7t.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/vn9s11.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/nk3lh8.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/fk0qfj.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/311n2y.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/bueyk6.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/erooc5.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/f4pkfo.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/k0j51q.pngNAI3 isn't short of it's downsides, though. There's no controlnet for a start, so some of the high fidelity adjustments aren't possible. It has inpaint at least.
Potentially the biggest downside is that it has no LoRA support — whatever is in the model today is what it can generate forever more until the Turk creates a new model. I'm yet to come across a concept it couldn't do. (I've not exactly pushed it too hard, though.)
Pricing is, eh. I'm an Opus sub (top tier), so I have unlimited normal resolution gens (832x1216 portrait/ 1216x832 landscape), but I like the wallpaper size gens (1920x1088 and flipped) which come in at 48 anlas each. On just the subscription anlas that's about 200 generations at that size monthly, with each further gen costing about 5 cents each.
thanks for reading my blog
