>>41058573The thing I absolutely hate is being included when shit like this happens when I had nothing to do with any outburst. So it's not fine and dandy it just means it's going to happen again having to be included with irrational manchildren. It's expected for the woman to be irrational not the man. All that's been done is show our enemies that they were right about "us", embarrassed and shamed "us" towards her, and gave her power and control over "us" over the relationship instead of a mutual relationship with respect to boundaries and she should be coming to "us" like she was when that whole shit was going down last year. Instead it's "us" even those who did nothing wrong to her waiting around for her to address yet "another problem" between "us" instead of the focus being rightfully on our enemies. It's not like she doesn't already know our position in regards to male collabs.
