>>7092754I fully trust the devs they'll come up with something. SOMETHING is in the works, it taking comparatively long just means it's being tested, which is a good thing.
I see unlimited trading becoming a thing ironically when we limit it. One measure of limiting it would be to only allow buys when there's someone selling. You'd be WAY more conservative with your trades in that system, we would move on from obvious events making everyone fucking rich.
The Key question being - what could dictate coin availability and price?
For new coins one could imagine a kind of aution every day at adjustment, for instance well-performing coins would buy back some shares for a nice price while poor performers would have to give out discounted coins, devaluing the market value.
The specific algo behind such a system would have many things to learn from previous iterations
- value subs too much and Gura will blast the market
- value daily change too much and hiatuscoins will climb until they break hiatus and then do whatever haachama will do today
- establish too much of a shared number requirement to do anything and stuff like daggercoin will just do fucking nothing, forever, because if gura as much as sneezes she'll set the bar too high
>>7092938If 11k at not even 100k views is her baseline right now I'd actually expect her to rise a bit, at least for the week.
