>>93136138Funny, however, Harry Potter is not a historical record nor does it claim to be one, merely being fiction; the Bible is a collection of writings of different authors across generations and is made up of testimonies and historical records— not fiction
>>93136181That's not fair or correct, books are used as evidence all the time depending on their contents
As long as the book contains historical facts it can be used as such, which is how most of books of the Bible are formatted, with the exception of the psalms and the book of proverbs
Also mind showing where and how many of the claims have been "proven" false? Including which claims
