>>4880406Enough to do whatever she wants, in her personal life. But to self-fund an entire company? Or mostly self-fun? Not enough, likely. Not enough to do it while treating her talents the way she knows they deserve to be. If you have a small windfall, and allocate it correctly, you can live modestly-to-well for the rest of your life. Maybe you still do some work for some income, maybe not, but you'll never really worry for money, or ever have to take a job you don't want.
Company-scale expenditures are on another level. There is a reason that even with all of the superchat cuts that Cover gets, they're still raising external investment rounds so as to have the capital to grow.
>>4880295>would be enough to propel it into profit.Yeah but her job would literally be administrative work and accounting for 80% of her day, every day, until she could hire other, experienced, competent talent. And I don't know if she would be happy being that kind of administrator. A manager, maybe! But not an executive.
Being good at something does not mean you would be a good CEO for a company that involves that something. Maybe she could be a VP of Talent, a VP of Partnerships, some position that is the top the manager pyramid, or something... but I don't know if I see her doing investor pitches to a bunch of Japanese suits and then going back to review termsheets with lawyers for the rest of the day.
t. have run a company in an area I was "good at", and discovered I am not good at (and don't enjoy) the administrative stuff of the company itself, so yeah I am probably projecting a bit.
