>>39635953>>39635542ah. I was just about to ask. I've never used that before.
>>39635843and yes, I was originally asking about latent upscale
or hi-res fix, either or going to complete shit once you approach 2x of 512/768 on either dimension, because regular img2img kept it together AT 2x most of the time, even with 0.5-0.7 denoise.