>>35989166That's pretty much a given nanora, I mention it in the initial proposal because there's always talk on what a future rep may or may not think and that's been the common argument against writing lore for a different general, this at least gives anyone that could be interested a chance to clue in on it.
Also in my opinion, It's better than those calls for reps that we used to do because now there's no demand that someone come in and write lore, just that they glance at what someone else wrote nanora. As long as you aren't pulling a Cunt and keep everything short and concise, I don't see too much going wrong.
>>35989536>>35989746Nanohodo!
>>35989154Bread Dog, can you research some crop types? Kind of like the names and variations between different crops that can help with my Confectionary Compendium idea nanora?
