>>43279099>there's so much crap that it makes any negatives you want to change affect very little.I can see that. Sometimes I rarely bother with adding negative tags and it gives me good results from gen 1. Very rarely the AI does something really I dislike, like I wanted to make hair down Pekora but it kept giving me her twin braids, so I simply put "braid, twin braids" into negative before all the schizotags, so it takes priorirty. You can see in the catboxes I posted above.
>output I got from last thread and my negatives were onlyYes, I started using those tags as well since yesterday. They seem to be working well. I'll try to experiment and remove censored and such when prompting sfw images. But obviously you should keep those for nsfw.
>Negatives are pretty model dependent thoughAbsolutely! And as I said in previous thread, dof and blurry are VERY model dependant. On the one I am using right now, it has 0 dof or blur generated so it's useless and can only make the output worse. For creamsicle and AOM mixes, you should keep those. Though I don't mind a bit of blur here and there, it makes the foreground get highlighted like here for instance.
https://files.catbox.moe/eoo4ch.png>You can get away with less negatives on hll1 based stuff but you'd need more on hll3.The other way around, no? For goodshit model schizoprompts were a must imo. In hll3 mixes, especially AOM ones you don't need many schizotags and those you used work well enough.
>>43279305No you don't. Don't listen to him.
>>43279470I don't know what you're trying to prove, anon. Like or not. Schizotags change the image, whether its to your liking or not is all on you.
