>>95069430>read his questions in the wrong tone and were being dicks needlesslyi disagree. the first 3 replies, which were immediate btw, answered his question without being dicks. the 4th reply was me just saying that 4chan isnt the best place to get "names". i guess i could of worded it differently but like you said
>it seems to me he never had any intention of changing his opinion of vtubing from the get-gohe was looking for a fight the moment he asked the question. that was his entire reason on even being on this board.
anyways its over and no reason to shit up our bread with his ignorance.
