>>93781877>So you admit that you didn't really read the Bible, you just took someone else's word for it.I didn't say that
>you claim to base your beliefs on a book that disproves itself. A book that lies is not a reliable book on which to base your worldviewI don't and it doesn't
>Apologists and priests are people who (intentionally or not, though in the case of apologists it is usually intentional) use various forms of sophistry to try to convince people of claims that are unfoundedNot true, actually
>Meds, you have to first show that apologetics are wrong and not biblical, which they aren't, because they literally deal with the bible and interpreting scripture in context
You've already proven my hypothesis, so I don't have to waste my time, believe or don't, my hands are clean, i warned you
