>>45205507My thoughts as well, but again, this is a preview image that it spat out in 5 seconds
quoted 2-3 minutes, and my machine is a fucking Ivy Bridge dinosaur, so I guess this is either 1. very multi-threaded, 12C/24T here even though they're slow and old hag cores, or 2. the devs assume their target demo uses Intel Atom netbooks, kek vs. the "final" images that take up to an hour to render?
>>45204821>>45204435I can actually see it using the dinky Radeon in this server. Only 10% utilization, but it's doing SOMETHING with it.
