>>26146509if you're genuine, you simply don't know the context behind them
>>26146801I'm not expecting you be honest in public
nor am I expecting you to believe you are in the wrong
I know you are someone who is mentally unwell and cannot fathom the idea that what you're doing isn't achieving some divine thing, you live on magical thinking while playing pretend in an attempt to defend yourself from self-criticizing.
I am someone who believes tearful artwork is beautiful, but what you are doing is forcing your beliefs onto someone in these images, feel free to request her in any emotion without your schizophrenic contexts which are nothing more than targeted harassment.
You are free to spend your money on things that will only make you upset as they get edited, just as I am free to continue to spend my time making alternate versions which she can actually use in a professional setting while also respecting the artists work via emulating the art-style.
You are a selfish person, and that is fine, but it's astonishing to me that you don't understand what I'm doing is not some sort of warfare.
Perhaps you should be paying significantly more and getting the full rights for these images so that you can make a claim people cannot do this? not that it would stop me or anyone else
