>>81602009(Reposting since I missed out on a few gens in the Ina set).
>>81537882No hires, sorry - PC locked up a few times (AMD debuff). Might redo and reupload later.
Picrel is a blooper using 2dnpony instead of midkemia, which turned out pretty good actually.
https://files.catbox.moe/5kml95.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/h8d4pg.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/edbi7c.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/r9i0qj.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/ur8hau.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/78gcrr.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/twsd3q.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/853y8n.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/bi09if.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/1ehlb6.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/skc745.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/g8il6q.pnghttps://files.catbox.moe/poajjo.png >>81610545Facts, where can I sign up to your newsletter?
But in all seriousness, good and thoughtful points. It's the same deal for jobs IRL - your top workers (artists) with USP will remain secure because AI can't replicate their ability; it's your average workers who (ironically) produce slop who get replaced. Although there is a slightly grey area when AI "artists" start masking their metadata and selling their gens, which I'm not going to get into.
Also agree on R34 and slop. I think most people still have an outdated mental model on how AI looks, based on the older models where everything looks the same and/or uncanny with zero QC.
