>>5906883The chocolate that they gave the soliders did have meth, but i doubt it was the sole reason Germany was able to take so much land and more to do with how Germany caught their enemies off guard with the new type of warfare of being fast instead of a war of attrition like you said, but that doesn't mean that was Hitler a bad general. There was a lot of times he was right and if he had listened to his generals things might have gone worse and vise versa, but the tactic s that they used and the way they formed their armies, and trained them was very efficient to the point the allies copied them.
But it's stupid to think that the only reason they stopped winning was because of lack of meth that's crazy, they lost because of lack of oil, the winter, and a 2 front war.
