>>57244087>>57246057Yeah it's a bit of a fuzzy line talking about writing schlock when the market for said schlock is thriving. You can't necessarily differentiate between someone producing it because they're a lazy shit and someone producing it because they're trend-savvy and looking to cash in. I've seen otherwise vanilla artists suddenly release one trashy NTR work, rake in thousands, and then go right back to business as usual more than a few times. Shame for more nuanced NTS though, it's magnitudes hotter and far rarer.
>>57245370O-Oh...
