>>6679302Perhaps you have a valid point. I can't say the way I write is quite so regular as many here. I am unfortunately used to this grammatical pattern by now though, which makes this task ever more difficult. I will take your advice under consideration however.
Thank you for your feedback.
>>6678761This is something I had considered also. New anons have apparently greater interest in the light-hearted comedic aspect of the threads. As before, thank you for the feedback. I will endeavour to adjust my posting accordingly.
>>6678861If we cannot regain reasonable interest within the next few threads, I will likely retire them in their entirety. As you and
>>6678820 have stated, without new content, the threads simply will not attain any significant longevity.
My thanks for your advice, anons.
